I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
第五十六条 当事人可以就查明事实的专门性问题向仲裁庭申请鉴定。仲裁庭根据当事人的申请或者自行判断认为对专门性问题需要鉴定的，可以交由当事人约定的鉴定人鉴定，也可以由仲裁庭指定的鉴定人鉴定。
，这一点在夫子中也有详细论述
（一）从销售方取得的增值税专用发票上列明的增值税税额；
'During yesterday’s strongest storm in two decades, there was plenty of red glow. It felt as if we were literally sailing inside that light,' Kud-Sverchkov wrote on his Telegram channel on 20 January
Nicola Smith said the day her husband underwent the transplant was a "very long day".